Dacia Duster 2013 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 201 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Duster engine produces 24 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 69 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Dacia Duster reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Duster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Duster consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Dacia Duster over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Duster consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Dacia Duster can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Dacia Duster version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from two 4x4 versions of Dacia Duster 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Dacia Duster is larger. Dacia Duster is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 473 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1636 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Dacia Duster has more luggage capacity. Dacia Duster has 54 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Duster (by 417 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Duster is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`775 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Duster has serious deffects in 210 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Duster has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |