Citroen Xsara 1998 vs Toyota Paseo 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 167 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 193 NM | 130 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Citroen Xsara is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Xsara engine produces 77 HP more power than Toyota Paseo, whereas torque is 63 NM more than Toyota Paseo. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.3 | |
The Toyota Paseo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Paseo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
760 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
Toyota Paseo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.17 m | 4.16 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.36 m | 1.29 m | |
Citroen Xsara is larger. Citroen Xsara is 1 cm longer than the Toyota Paseo, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 278 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Paseo, which means Citroen Xsara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`385 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Toyota Paseo has
| |