Citroen Xsara 1998 vs Toyota Paseo 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Citroen Xsara engine produces 13 HP more power than Toyota Paseo, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Toyota Paseo. Despite the higher power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 7.3 | |
|
The Toyota Paseo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Paseo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.29 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is larger. Citroen Xsara is 1 cm longer than the Toyota Paseo, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 278 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Paseo, which means Citroen Xsara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`385 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Toyota Paseo has
| |