Citroen Xsara 1999 vs Seat Cordoba 1999

 
Citroen Xsara
1999 - 2000
Seat Cordoba
1999 - 2003
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 90 HP100 HP
Torque: 135 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.5 seconds11 seconds
Seat Cordoba is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen Xsara engine produces 10 HP less power than Seat Cordoba, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Seat Cordoba. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.87.8
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 690 km in combined cycle570 km in combined cycle
900 km on highway750 km on highway
Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Cordoba engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 8 years11 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Peugeot 206, Peugeot 306, Citroen Xsara Picasso, Peugeot 106Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Seat Toledo, Seat Ibiza
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Cordoba might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Seat Cordoba engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.17 m4.16 m
Width: 1.70 m1.64 m
Height: 1.40 m1.42 m
Citroen Xsara is larger, but slightly lower.
Citroen Xsara is 1 cm longer than the Seat Cordoba, 6 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Cordoba.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1001`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

average
Seat Cordoba has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Cordoba, so Seat Cordoba quality is probably better
Average price (€): 800no data
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Seat Cordoba has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv