Citroen Xsara 1998 vs Alfa Romeo GTV 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 271 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo GTV is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara engine produces 110 HP less power than Alfa Romeo GTV, whereas torque is 136 NM less than Alfa Romeo GTV. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 10.8 | |
|
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo GTV, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller, but higher. Citroen Xsara is 11 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo GTV, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 110 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.5 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo GTV, which means Citroen Xsara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Alfa Romeo GTV has
| |