Citroen Xsara 2002 vs Seat Cordoba 2000

 
Citroen Xsara
2002 - 2003
Seat Cordoba
2000 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 137 HP156 HP
Torque: 190 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.6 seconds7.9 seconds
Seat Cordoba is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen Xsara engine produces 19 HP less power than Seat Cordoba, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Seat Cordoba. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.77.8
Citroen Xsara consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle570 km in combined cycle
960 km on highway750 km on highway
Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.19 m4.16 m
Width: 1.70 m1.64 m
Height: 1.40 m1.42 m
Citroen Xsara is larger, but slightly lower.
Citroen Xsara is 3 cm longer than the Seat Cordoba, 6 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Cordoba.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1001`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

average
Citroen Xsara has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Cordoba has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 1000no data
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Seat Cordoba has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv