Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Seat Cordoba 1999

 
Citroen Xsara
2000 - 2003
Seat Cordoba
1999 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 110 HP100 HP
Torque: 147 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 seconds11 seconds
Citroen Xsara is more dynamic to drive.
Citroen Xsara engine produces 10 HP more power than Seat Cordoba, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Seat Cordoba. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.97.8
Real fuel consumption: 7.4 l/100km8.4 l/100km
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen Xsara consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle570 km in combined cycle
980 km on highway750 km on highway
720 km with real consumption530 km with real consumption
Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Engine production duration: 15 years11 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Peugeot 206Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Seat Toledo, Seat Ibiza
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.19 m4.16 m
Width: 1.70 m1.64 m
Height: 1.40 m1.42 m
Citroen Xsara is larger, but slightly lower.
Citroen Xsara is 3 cm longer than the Seat Cordoba, 6 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Cordoba.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1001`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

average
Citroen Xsara has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Cordoba has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 1000no data
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv