Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Chrysler Sebring 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Citroen Xsara engine produces 93 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, whereas torque is 131 NM less than Chrysler Sebring. Despite less power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Xsara consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 480 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen Xsara is 64 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |