Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Audi A3 2000
Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 71 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 125 NM | 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
Audi A3 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara engine produces 19 HP less power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Audi A3. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 4.9 | |
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
1080 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.15 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
Citroen Xsara is 22 cm longer than the Audi A3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1100 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi A3. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`745 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Audi A3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 7.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Audi A3 has
| |