Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Volkswagen Golf 1999

 
Citroen Xsara
2000 - 2003
Volkswagen Golf
1999 - 2000
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 110 HP101 HP
Torque: 147 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds13.7 seconds
Citroen Xsara engine produces 9 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Volkswagen Golf.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.68.5
Real fuel consumption: 9.2 l/100km9.3 l/100km
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen Xsara consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 710 km in combined cycle640 km in combined cycle
960 km on highway840 km on highway
580 km with real consumption590 km with real consumption

Engines

Engine production duration: 15 years14 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Peugeot 206Used also on Volkswagen Bora
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.40 m
Width: 1.70 m1.74 m
Height: 1.42 m1.47 m
Citroen Xsara is smaller.
Citroen Xsara is 3 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data465 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1425 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf.
Gross weight (kg): 1`0001`625
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

high
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10001600
Rating in user reviews: 8.4/10 7.6/10
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Volkswagen Golf has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv