Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Volkswagen Golf 1999
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 120 NM | 128 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
Citroen Xsara and Volkswagen Golf have the same engine power, but Citroen Xsara torque is 8 NM less than Volkswagen Golf. Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.7 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
1000 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
800 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.40 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.47 m | |
Citroen Xsara is smaller. Citroen Xsara is 3 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1470 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`735 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | high | |
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 7.6/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |