Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Audi A3 2000

 
Citroen Xsara
2000 - 2003
Audi A3
2000 - 2003
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 75 HP102 HP
Torque: 120 NM148 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.2 seconds10.9 seconds
Audi A3 is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen Xsara engine produces 27 HP less power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Audi A3. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.76.8
Real fuel consumption: 6.7 l/100km7.7 l/100km
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen Xsara consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway1030 km on highway
800 km with real consumption710 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km460'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A3 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 13 years2 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Citroen BerlingoUsed also on Volkswagen Golf
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Audi A3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.15 m
Width: 1.70 m1.74 m
Height: 1.42 m1.43 m
Citroen Xsara is 22 cm longer than the Audi A3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1110 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi A3.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1001`650
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Citroen Xsara has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Audi A3 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 10001600
Rating in user reviews: 8.4/10 7.3/10
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Audi A3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv