Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Alfa Romeo 156 2002

 
Citroen Xsara
2003 - 2005
Alfa Romeo 156
2002 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP115 HP
Torque: 205 NM275 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds10.7 seconds
Alfa Romeo 156 is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen Xsara engine produces 25 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 156, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Alfa Romeo 156. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.56.0
Real fuel consumption: 5.9 l/100km6.0 l/100km
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen Xsara consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle1050 km in combined cycle
1250 km on highway1280 km on highway
910 km with real consumption1050 km with real consumption
Alfa Romeo 156 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.43 m
Width: 1.70 m1.74 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Citroen Xsara is smaller.
Citroen Xsara is 6 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 156, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no data360 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1180 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.9 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 156, which means Citroen Xsara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1001`815
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

low
Citroen Xsara has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 156 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 8001400
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Alfa Romeo 156 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv