Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Peugeot 206 2002
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 147 NM | 147 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
Citroen Xsara and Peugeot 206 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.5 | |
Citroen Xsara consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
960 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.03 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
Citroen Xsara is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen Xsara is 34 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, 5 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 313 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 9.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.8 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Citroen Xsara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Citroen Xsara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |