Citroen Xsara 2004 vs Peugeot 206 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 68 HP | 68 HP | |
Torque: | 150 NM | 150 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
Citroen Xsara and Peugeot 206 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.4 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 50 litres | |
1030 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.03 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
Citroen Xsara is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen Xsara is 34 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, 5 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 313 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1136 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 9.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.8 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Citroen Xsara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`563 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Citroen Xsara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |