Citroen Xsara 1997 vs Audi A3 1996

 
Citroen Xsara
1997 - 1999
Audi A3
1996 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP90 HP
Torque: 196 NM202 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.8 seconds12.4 seconds
Audi A3 is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen Xsara and Audi A3 have the same engine power, but Citroen Xsara torque is 6 NM less than Audi A3. Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.64.9
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Citroen Xsara consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 255 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 810 km in combined cycle1120 km in combined cycle
1030 km on highway1340 km on highway
Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.17 m4.15 m
Width: 1.70 m1.74 m
Height: 1.40 m1.42 m
Citroen Xsara is 2 cm longer than the Audi A3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1100 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi A3.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1001`680
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Audi A3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 6001000
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara has
  • lower price
Audi A3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv