Citroen Xsara 1997 vs Citroen Xsara 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 71 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 15.8 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara 1997 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Xsara 1997 engine produces 19 HP more power than Citroen Xsara 2000, whereas torque is 71 NM more than Citroen Xsara 2000. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara 1997 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.2 | |
|
The Citroen Xsara 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara 1997 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara 2000, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara 1997 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| Citroen Xsara 2000 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xsara 1997 is 2 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara 2000, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |