Citroen Xsara 1997 vs Peugeot 306 1999

 
Citroen Xsara
1997 - 2000
Peugeot 306
1999 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 68 HP70 HP
Torque: 120 NM125 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17.2 seconds17.2 seconds
Citroen Xsara engine produces 2 HP less power than Peugeot 306, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Peugeot 306.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.46.2
Citroen Xsara consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 840 km in combined cycle960 km in combined cycle
1010 km on highway1200 km on highway
Peugeot 306 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 700'000 km560'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen Xsara engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 23 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Citroen Berlingo, Citroen Xantia, Rover 400Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Peugeot 206, Citroen Berlingo
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.17 m4.03 m
Width: 1.70 m1.68 m
Height: 1.40 m1.36 m
Citroen Xsara is larger.
Citroen Xsara is 14 cm longer than the Peugeot 306, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data340 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1146 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.5 metres less than that of the Peugeot 306, which means Citroen Xsara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1001`530
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Peugeot 306 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Citroen Xsara, so Peugeot 306 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 6001000
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Peugeot 306 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv