Citroen Xsara 1997 vs Citroen Xsara 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara 2000 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara 1997 and Citroen Xsara 2000 have the same engine power, but Citroen Xsara 1997 torque is 8 NM less than Citroen Xsara 2000. Citroen Xsara 1997 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Xsara 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Xsara 1997 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara 2000, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara 1997 could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara 1997 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara 2000. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Xsara 2000 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xsara 1997 is 2 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara 2000, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |