Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Seat Cordoba 2006
Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 71 HP | 100 HP | |
Torque: | 125 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.8 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
Seat Cordoba is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara engine produces 29 HP less power than Seat Cordoba, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Seat Cordoba. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 4.9 | |
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.19 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
Citroen Xsara is 9 cm shorter than the Seat Cordoba, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen Xsara is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 485 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Cordoba. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |