Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.8 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara engine produces 19 HP less power than Citroen Xsara Picasso, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Citroen Xsara Picasso. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.5 | |
|
The Citroen Xsara Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| Citroen Xsara Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller. Citroen Xsara is 9 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 24 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Citroen Xsara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 6.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |