Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Citroen C2 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 71 HP | 68 HP | |
Torque: | 125 NM | 150 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.8 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
Citroen C2 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara engine produces 3 HP more power than Citroen C2, but torque is 25 NM less than Citroen C2. Despite the higher power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 4.1 | |
The Citroen C2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 41 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
1080 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
Citroen C2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.19 m | 3.67 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.46 m | |
Citroen Xsara is larger, but lower. Citroen Xsara is 52 cm longer than the Citroen C2, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 166 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 879 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 9.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 1.1 metres more than that of the Citroen C2, which means Citroen Xsara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`390 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Citroen Xsara has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Citroen C2, so Citroen Xsara quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Citroen C2 has
| |