Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Seat Cordoba 2006

 
Citroen Xsara
2000 - 2003
Seat Cordoba
2006 - 2006
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP75 HP
Torque: 120 NM126 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.7 seconds13.6 seconds
Citroen Xsara and Seat Cordoba have the same engine power, but Citroen Xsara torque is 6 NM less than Seat Cordoba. Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.76.4
Citroen Xsara consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 45 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.19 m4.28 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.40 m1.44 m
Citroen Xsara is 9 cm shorter than the Seat Cordoba, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen Xsara is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data485 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Cordoba.
Gross weight (kg): 1`100800
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

below average
Average price (€): 8001400
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara has
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv