Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Opel Corsa 2000

 
Citroen Xsara
2003 - 2004
Opel Corsa
2000 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.7 Diesel

Performance

Power: 71 HP65 HP
Torque: 125 NM130 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.8 seconds14.5 seconds
Opel Corsa is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen Xsara engine produces 6 HP more power than Opel Corsa, but torque is 5 NM less than Opel Corsa. Despite the higher power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.24.7
The Opel Corsa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Citroen Xsara consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Corsa, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 225 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres44 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 870 km in combined cycle930 km in combined cycle
1080 km on highway1070 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.19 m3.82 m
Width: 1.70 m1.65 m
Height: 1.40 m1.44 m
Citroen Xsara is larger, but slightly lower.
Citroen Xsara is 37 cm longer than the Opel Corsa, 5 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data260 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1060 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters9.9 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.8 metres more than that of the Opel Corsa, which means Citroen Xsara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1001`505
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Citroen Xsara has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Corsa has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably better
Average price (€): 4001200
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara has
  • more power
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Opel Corsa has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv