Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Opel Astra 1998

 
Citroen Xsara
2003 - 2004
Opel Astra
1998 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 71 HP82 HP
Torque: 125 NM185 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.8 seconds14.5 seconds
Opel Astra is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen Xsara engine produces 11 HP less power than Opel Astra, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Opel Astra. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.25.8
The Opel Astra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Citroen Xsara consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 870 km in combined cycle890 km in combined cycle
1080 km on highway1080 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.19 m4.11 m
Width: 1.70 m1.71 m
Height: 1.40 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xsara is 8 cm longer than the Opel Astra, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1180 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.1 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.6 metres more than that of the Opel Astra, which means Citroen Xsara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1001`745
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Citroen Xsara has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Astra has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 4001000
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Opel Astra has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv