Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Renault Clio 2003

 
Citroen Xsara
2003 - 2004
Renault Clio
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 71 HP65 HP
Torque: 125 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.8 seconds15 seconds
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen Xsara engine produces 6 HP more power than Renault Clio, but torque is 35 NM less than Renault Clio. Despite the higher power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.24.3
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Citroen Xsara consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 285 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 870 km in combined cycle1160 km in combined cycle
1080 km on highway1350 km on highway
Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.19 m3.81 m
Width: 1.70 m1.64 m
Height: 1.40 m1.42 m
Citroen Xsara is larger, but slightly lower.
Citroen Xsara is 38 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 6 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data255 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1037 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Clio.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1001`515
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

low
Citroen Xsara has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 4001200
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara has
  • more power
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Renault Clio has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv