Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Opel Corsa 2000

 
Citroen Xsara
2003 - 2004
Opel Corsa
2000 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 75 HP90 HP
Torque: 120 NM125 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.7 seconds11.5 seconds
Opel Corsa is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen Xsara engine produces 15 HP less power than Opel Corsa, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Opel Corsa. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.77.2
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km7.1 l/100km
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen Xsara consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Corsa, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Corsa.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres44 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle610 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway770 km on highway
790 km with real consumption610 km with real consumption
Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Corsa engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 13 years4 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Citroen BerlingoUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Opel Corsa engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.19 m3.82 m
Width: 1.70 m1.65 m
Height: 1.40 m1.44 m
Citroen Xsara is larger, but slightly lower.
Citroen Xsara is 37 cm longer than the Opel Corsa, 5 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data260 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1060 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters9.9 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.8 metres more than that of the Opel Corsa, which means Citroen Xsara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1001`500
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Citroen Xsara has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Corsa has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably better
Average price (€): 4001200
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Opel Corsa has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv