Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Audi A3 2007

 
Citroen Xsara
2003 - 2004
Audi A3
2007 - 2008
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP125 HP
Torque: 120 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.7 seconds9.8 seconds
Audi A3 is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen Xsara engine produces 50 HP less power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Audi A3. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.76.5
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km7.1 l/100km
By specification Citroen Xsara consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 30 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen Xsara consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle840 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway1030 km on highway
790 km with real consumption770 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.19 m4.29 m
Width: 1.70 m1.76 m
Height: 1.40 m1.42 m
Citroen Xsara is smaller.
Citroen Xsara is 10 cm shorter than the Audi A3, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1120 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.7 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`1001`860
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

high
Audi A3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 4003200
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara has
  • lower price
Audi A3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv