Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Audi A3 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 125 HP | |
Torque: | 120 NM | 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
Audi A3 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara engine produces 50 HP less power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Audi A3. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
By specification Citroen Xsara consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen Xsara consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
1000 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
790 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.19 m | 4.29 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
Citroen Xsara is smaller. Citroen Xsara is 10 cm shorter than the Audi A3, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1120 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`860 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | high | |
Audi A3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 400 | 3200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Audi A3 has
| |