Citroen Xsara 2004 vs Citroen Xsara 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 71 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.7 seconds | 15.8 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara 2000 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara 2004 engine produces 3 HP less power than Citroen Xsara 2000, but torque is 25 NM more than Citroen Xsara 2000. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara 2004 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 6.2 | |
|
The Citroen Xsara 2004 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara 2004 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara 2000, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara 2004 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| Citroen Xsara 2004 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xsara 2004 and Citroen Xsara 2000 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |