Citroen Xsara 1998 vs Chrysler Neon 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 167 HP | 115 - 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 - 205 NM | 152 - 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 17.2 seconds | 8.8 - 11.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 9.4 | 8.0 - 8.5 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Neon. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen Xsara is 19 cm shorter than the Chrysler Neon, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 364 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`610 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |