Citroen Xsara 1998 vs Toyota Paseo 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citroen Xsara is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Toyota Paseo is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 167 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 - 205 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 17.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 9.4 | 7.3 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Paseo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.29 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is larger. Citroen Xsara is 1 cm longer than the Toyota Paseo, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 278 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Paseo, which means Citroen Xsara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`385 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Toyota Paseo has
| |