Citroen Xsara 1998 vs Nissan 200 SX 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Citroen Xsara is available with front wheel drive, while Nissan 200 SX can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 167 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 - 205 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 17.2 seconds | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 9.4 | 8.8 - 8.9 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan 200 SX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller, but higher. Citroen Xsara is 35 cm shorter than the Nissan 200 SX, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 307 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 1.1 metres more than that of the Nissan 200 SX, which means Citroen Xsara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Nissan 200 SX has
| |