Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Ford Focus 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 167 HP | 75 - 215 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 125 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 15.8 seconds | 6.7 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 9.3 | 5.3 - 10.1 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Focus. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.15 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xsara is 4 cm longer than the Ford Focus, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen Xsara is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1210 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Focus. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`654 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Ford Focus has
| |