Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Fiat Punto 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 167 HP | 60 - 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 102 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 15.8 seconds | 8.6 - 14.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 9.3 | 4.5 - 8.3 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Fiat Punto. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Punto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is larger, but lower. Citroen Xsara is 35 cm longer than the Fiat Punto, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 264 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1080 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres more than that of the Fiat Punto. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`493 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Fiat Punto has
| |