Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Volkswagen Golf 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Citroen Xsara is available only with front wheel drive, while Volkswagen Golf can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 137 HP | 68 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 128 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 16 seconds | 8.8 - 18.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 7.7 | 5.0 - 14.8 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Golf. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller. Citroen Xsara is 3 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1470 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`086 | ~ 1`826 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |