Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Alfa Romeo 156 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 137 HP | 105 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 144 - 304 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 16 seconds | 7.4 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 7.7 | 6.0 - 12.0 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo 156. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller. Citroen Xsara is 6 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 156, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 360 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1180 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.9 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 156, which means Citroen Xsara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`086 | ~ 1`837 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 6.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
| |