Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Citroen Xsara 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 137 HP | 71 - 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 120 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 16 seconds | 8.6 - 15.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 7.7 | 5.2 - 7.7 | |
|
On average, the Citroen Xsara 2000 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Citroen Xsara 2000. On average, Citroen Xsara 2000 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara 2000. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
| Citroen Xsara 2000 is 18 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara 2000, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen Xsara 2000 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`086 | ~ 1`086 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |