Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Peugeot 206 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.1 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 110 HP | 60 - 138 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 94 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 16 seconds | 9.3 - 15.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 7.6 | 4.4 - 7.9 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 206. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen Xsara is 34 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, 5 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 313 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1365 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.8 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Citroen Xsara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`083 | ~ 1`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |