Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Citroen Xsara 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 110 HP | 71 - 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 120 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 16 seconds | 8.8 - 16 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 7.6 | 5.3 - 7.7 | |
|
Citroen Xsara 2003 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara 2000. On average, a Citroen Xsara 2003 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Citroen Xsara 2000. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xsara 2003 and Citroen Xsara 2000 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`083 | ~ 1`086 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
| |