Citroen Xsara 1997 vs Audi A3 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Citroen Xsara is available only with front wheel drive, while Audi A3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 135 HP | 90 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 - 205 NM | 145 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | 7.5 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 9.1 | 4.9 - 8.9 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi A3. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.15 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
| Citroen Xsara is 2 cm longer than the Audi A3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1110 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi A3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Audi A3 has
| |