Citroen Xsara 1997 vs Peugeot 306 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 135 HP | 70 - 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 - 205 NM | 111 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | 10.3 - 17.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 9.1 | 5.2 - 9.1 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 306. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is larger. Citroen Xsara is 14 cm longer than the Peugeot 306, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1146 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres less than that of the Peugeot 306. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`519 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Peugeot 306 has
| |