Citroen Xsara 1997 vs Fiat Brava 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 135 HP | 75 - 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 - 205 NM | 113 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | 10.6 - 15.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 9.1 | 5.5 - 9.2 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Fiat Brava. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Brava. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller. Citroen Xsara is 2 cm shorter than the Fiat Brava, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 775 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.3 metres more than that of the Fiat Brava. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`662 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Fiat Brava has
| |