Citroen Xsara 1997 vs Citroen Xsara 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 135 HP | 71 - 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 - 205 NM | 120 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | 8.6 - 15.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 9.1 | 5.2 - 7.7 | |
|
Citroen Xsara 1997 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara 2000. On average, Citroen Xsara 1997 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara 2000. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xsara 1997 is 2 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara 2000, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`086 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |