Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Seat Cordoba 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 137 HP | 70 - 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 112 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 15.8 seconds | 10.6 - 15.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 7.7 | 4.6 - 7.5 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Cordoba. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
| Citroen Xsara is 9 cm shorter than the Seat Cordoba, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen Xsara is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 485 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Cordoba. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`086 | ~ 933 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |