Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Citroen Xsara 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 137 HP | 68 - 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 120 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 15.8 seconds | 8.6 - 16.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 7.7 | 4.5 - 7.7 | |
|
On average, the Citroen Xsara 2000 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Citroen Xsara 2003. On average, Citroen Xsara 2000 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara 2003. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xsara 2000 and Citroen Xsara 2003 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`086 | ~ 1`088 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |