Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 137 HP | 90 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 135 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 15.8 seconds | 12.2 - 16.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 7.7 | 5.5 - 8.7 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara Picasso. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller. Citroen Xsara is 9 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 24 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Citroen Xsara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`086 | ~ 1`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 6.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
| |