Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Citroen C2 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 137 HP | 61 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 94 - 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 15.8 seconds | 8.9 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 7.7 | 4.1 - 6.9 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C2. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 3.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is larger, but lower. Citroen Xsara is 52 cm longer than the Citroen C2, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 193 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 879 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.5 metres less than that of the Citroen C2, which means Citroen Xsara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`086 | ~ 1`390 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Citroen C2 has
| |