Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Opel Corsa 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.0 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 137 HP | 58 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 85 - 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 16.7 seconds | 9 - 17 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.7 | 4.7 - 7.9 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Corsa. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Corsa. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen Xsara is 37 cm longer than the Opel Corsa, 5 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1060 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.8 metres more than that of the Opel Corsa, which means Citroen Xsara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`088 | ~ 1`482 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Opel Corsa has
| |