Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Audi A3 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Citroen Xsara is available only with front wheel drive, while Audi A3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 137 HP | 102 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 148 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 16.7 seconds | 6.3 - 13.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.7 | 5.1 - 10.6 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi A3. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller. Citroen Xsara is 10 cm shorter than the Audi A3, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1120 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`088 | ~ 1`944 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Audi A3 has
| |