Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Renault Clio 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 137 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 93 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 16.7 seconds | 9.6 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.7 | 4.2 - 7.4 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen Xsara is 38 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 6 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1037 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`088 | ~ 1`501 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Renault Clio has
| |